Saturday, April 26, 2008

Mount And Blade More Men

I WANT YOU

Ero passata per chiedere solo delle informazioni e mi sono ritrovata a sottoscrivere un pacchetto alla Wall Street institute per un corso di inglese con annesso un contratto di finanziamento (l'ho capito solo dopo che pagavo una finanziaria e non la scuola) pari a 4172 Euro da restituire in 28 rate da 149 euro al mese. Classico convincimento ad arte con gioco di parole, di quelle cose lampo che neppure hai il tempo di razionalizzare, firmi qua, firmi la' e ti trovi incastrato con le tue stesse mani. Dopo esattamente 3 giorni dalla sottoscrizione ed aver seguito 2 lezioni, ho capito di aver fatto a large cabbage, also because 'I have a job that I'm leaving (for personal reasons) and very little money and the course and' unsatisfactory. I opt for the withdrawal. The practice of finance at financial-mi says the call center suite that contact - and not 'playing again' cause I immediately sent a letter to withdraw early from a fax machine, both the financial school. The school she answers instead must assess the case and that my question may not be accepted because I enjoyed the first two lessons .... just two lessons! Possible that there is no right of withdrawal in this case? the rest have gone just 3 days after signing the contract ... we are marching, or they are right? What can I do to enforce i miei diritti? Loro del resto non mi hanno fatto fare neppure una prova...Grazie...

Risposta dell'ADUC il diritto di recesso si puo' esercitare se previsto dal contratto, oppure nei casi stabiliti dalla legge: http://www.aduc.it/dyn/sosonline/schedapratica/sche_mostra.php?Scheda=134100 Nel caso della finanziaria, visto che non l'hanno informata sulle caratteristiche del contratto, puo' chiedere l'annullamento dello stesso. Le consigliamo, se non l'ha gia' fatto, di procedere con raccomandata a/r di messa in mora: http://www.aduc.it/dyn/sosonline/schedapratica/sche_mostra.php?Scheda=111051

IL VIRUS DELLA VERITA' "V2DAY"

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

Filmpjes Van Bulma En Vegeta

UN ANNO DOPO

"questa lettera è allucinante, dovete solamente vergognarvi... "
10 Aprile 2008. Wall street institute
Buongiorno,
Preferirei al momento rimanere anonimo, visto che parlo per conto di un'altra persona.
Vi spiego velocemente quale è il problema, circa un anno e mezzo fa, Cinzia (nome inventato) ha incontrato per strada una sua vecchia amica/compagna di scuola, questa tipa che lavora alla wall street institute, raccontando il suo lavoro, ha invitato Cinzia a vedere una lezione per capire come funzionasse, e portandola in ufficio gli ha fatto firmare delle liberatorie Privacy Policy .... Cynthia naively, as we knew for many years, she signed without reading.
After about a year (then about a month ago), Cynthia was contacted by an attorney of a financial, intimated that the well to pay € 2500 (that is the cost of an English course of the last one year) because she did not could not even have to pay the installments!
at this point, I presume that the law does not protect those who signed without reading, but know so much scam .... and secondly, as Cynthia, not knowing that they have signed for a course, of course, has never participated in any course, could expect to carry out the course or the course can be transferred to third parties?
least you please help me.
I look forward to your own .....( hopefully) useful answer.
greetings

Answer dell'ADUC should proceed against the person, sign making, he has duped. It is claimed in a letter registered letter of formal notice in which it promises, as compensation for the scam, but what it has considered: http://www.aduc.it/dyn/sosonline/schedapratica/sche_mostra. php? Card = 111051

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Moncler Outlet Manhattan

INCATENATI



Hi, I enrolled in an English course at the Institute Sallstreet, signing a contract that commits me to a monthly payment for 16 months. I attended for three months. Have appeared since then, serious grounds work hours that prevent me from attending classes and in the future in any of their seats, following your advice, I wrote them a recommendation requesting the amicable resolution of the contract, even willing to pay a penalty if, pointing to the fact that the law allows contracts to be performed permanently or recurrently, the right to withdraw unilaterally. Their response was that (I quote) "its contract, as evidenced by the General Conditions, does not allow to withdraw unilaterally." But my contract, I think, is to be performed permanently or recurrently. So they lie?
I want to know if a contract that clearly indicates a start and its duration (16 months) may be described, rightly, contract operations or regular? I would also refer
as set forth in paragraph 6 of the General Conditions with respect to the right of withdrawal, since it seems clear to me, contrary to what scrittomi by the school director, who at that point can be inferred implicitly my right to withdraw. I quote (only the interesting part): Subject to the provisions of the law regarding termination, if the customer is a consumer (ex art.3 Lett. To Legislative Decree no. 206/2005), which has concluded this contract in place other than a Center "Wallstreet Institute has recognized the right of withdrawal under ETCC .. etc ... ..
That "subject to the provisions law on the subject of withdrawal "seems implicitly contains all the other articles that regulate the contracts, including 1373 cc note that says, among other things:" in the contracts to be performed permanently or recurrently this option can be exercised even after
"unless the services performed or may be in progress." I have some reason to rely on? And if so, will the case of dropping the resolution and kindly go through the courts?
Thank you in advance.

dell'ADUC no response, the contract in question is not 'in our view a contract to run regular and continuous basis, it is a limited period and for a finite supply. Inoltre la clausola che ci ha riportato riguarda la normativa sul recesso fuori dai locali commerciali, che non si applica al caso di specie.
Legga la nostra scheda pratica sul diritto di recesso: http://www.aduc.it/dyn/sosonline/schedapratica/sche_mostra.php?Scheda=134100


BASTA POCO AD ESSER INTOLLERANTI...