Hi, I enrolled in an English course at the Institute Sallstreet, signing a contract that commits me to a monthly payment for 16 months. I attended for three months. Have appeared since then, serious grounds work hours that prevent me from attending classes and in the future in any of their seats, following your advice, I wrote them a recommendation requesting the amicable resolution of the contract, even willing to pay a penalty if, pointing to the fact that the law allows contracts to be performed permanently or recurrently, the right to withdraw unilaterally. Their response was that (I quote) "its contract, as evidenced by the General Conditions, does not allow to withdraw unilaterally." But my contract, I think, is to be performed permanently or recurrently. So they lie?
I want to know if a contract that clearly indicates a start and its duration (16 months) may be described, rightly, contract operations or regular? I would also refer
as set forth in paragraph 6 of the General Conditions with respect to the right of withdrawal, since it seems clear to me, contrary to what scrittomi by the school director, who at that point can be inferred implicitly my right to withdraw. I quote (only the interesting part): Subject to the provisions of the law regarding termination, if the customer is a consumer (ex art.3 Lett. To Legislative Decree no. 206/2005), which has concluded this contract in place other than a Center "Wallstreet Institute has recognized the right of withdrawal under ETCC .. etc ... ..
That "subject to the provisions law on the subject of withdrawal "seems implicitly contains all the other articles that regulate the contracts, including 1373 cc note that says, among other things:" in the contracts to be performed permanently or recurrently this option can be exercised even after
"unless the services performed or may be in progress." I have some reason to rely on? And if so, will the case of dropping the resolution and kindly go through the courts?
Thank you in advance.
dell'ADUC no response, the contract in question is not 'in our view a contract to run regular and continuous basis, it is a limited period and for a finite supply. Inoltre la clausola che ci ha riportato riguarda la normativa sul recesso fuori dai locali commerciali, che non si applica al caso di specie.
Legga la nostra scheda pratica sul diritto di recesso: http://www.aduc.it/dyn/sosonline/schedapratica/sche_mostra.php?Scheda=134100
BASTA POCO AD ESSER INTOLLERANTI...
0 comments:
Post a Comment